Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one Chinese restaurant in Bairenville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. This year, we have seen a number of "copycat" suits filed against each one of the eleven Chinese restaurants in Bairenville, forcing these restaurants to hire lawyers and take steps to defend themselves in court.
Which of following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?
A.Patrons of Chinese restaurants in Bairenville contract food poisoning at much higher rates than do patrons of any other kind of restaurant in Bairenville
B.For each of the eleven Chinese restaurants in Bairenville, at least one person has contracted food poisoning from a meal on some occasion.
C.The cooking methods used for Chinese food are less likely to kill germs than are the cooking methods used in other cuisines.
D.This year, a number of citizens of Bairenville have won substantial settlements as the result of lawsuits.
E.This year, some restaurants in Bairenville have been subjected to legal expenses, irrespective of whether any of their patrons have suffered from food poisoning.
新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT逻辑笔记分享，希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道! 一、 归纳题