课程咨询
美研留学资料领取

扫码添加助教

免费领取

备考资料大礼包

扫码关注公众号

GMAT写作黄金80题范文赏析22

2019-03-06 16:24:48来源:网络

  新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT写作黄金80题范文赏析22,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!

  “Scientists are continually redefining the standards for what is beneficial or harmful to the environment. Since these standards keep shifting, companies should resist changing their products and processes in response to each new recommendation until those recommendations become government regulations.”

  Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

  “科学家在不断重新制定对环境什么是有利的,什么是有害的的标准。由于这些标准不停变动,面对新建议,公司应该保持他们的产品和流程不变直到新的建议成为国家标准为止。”

  1. 科学家的建议也并不一定都是正确的。很有可能他的结论适用面很窄。或者他所得到的数据有错误等等。

  2. 对企业来说频繁的变更产品和生产流程会造成很大的经济损失

  3. 诚然等待国家制定标准很可能存在滞后等问题但是比较起来以上的问题还是应该等待国家制定标准。此外一个折中的方案是国家成立专门的机构快速地对新的方案和建议做出评价并迅速制定标准

  split the difference lag evaluate

  View1: The recommendations given by scientists are usually controversial or have inconsistent perspectives on same questions, thus can not provide clear directions on actions that companies should adopt,

  View 2: changing products and processes too often will inevitably increase cost and lower productivity. Therefore do harm to the companies .

  View3: while waiting for government regulations may draw back the processes of solving the problems, it is relatively a better strategy for companies to follow. We can count on the authorities to speed up the process of conversion between scientific discoveries and official regulations.

  The speaker argues that because scientists continually shift viewpoints about how our actions affect the natural environment, companies should not change their products and processes according to scientific recommendations until the government requires them to do so. This argument raises complex issues about the duties of business and about regulatory fairness and effectiveness. Although a wait-and-see (adj. 观望的) policy may help companies avoid costly and unnecessary changes, three countervailing considerations compel me to disagree overall with the argument.

  First, a regulatory system of environmental protection might not operate equitably. At first glance, a wait-and-see response might seem fair in that all companies would be subject to the same standards and same enforcement measures. However, enforcement requires detection, and while some violators may be caught, others might not. Moreover, a broad regulatory system imposes general standards that may not apply equitably to every company. Suppose, for example, that pollution from a company in a valley does more damage to the environment than similar pollution from a company on the coast. It would seem unfair to require the coastal company to invest as heavily in abatement or, in the extreme (adv. 非常, 极端), to shut down the operation if the company cannot afford abatement measures.

  Secondly, the argument assumes that the government regulations will properly reflect scientific recommendations. However, this claim is somewhat dubious. Companies with the most money and political influence, not the scientists, might in some cases dictate regulatory standards. In other words, legislators may be more influenced by political expediency and campaign pork (pork: government money, jobs, or favors used by politicians as patronage) than by societal concerns.

  Thirdly, waiting until government regulations are in place can have disastrous effects on the environment. A great deal of environmental damage can occur before regulations are implemented. This problem is compounded whenever government reaction to scientific evidence is slow. Moreover, the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency 美国环保署) might be overburdened with its detection and enforcement duties, thereby allowing continued environmental damage by companies who have not yet been caught or who appeal penalties.

  In conclusion, despite uncertainty within the scientific community about what environmental standards are best, companies should not wait for government regulation before reacting to warnings about environmental problems. The speaker’s recommended approach would in many cases operate inequitably among companies: moreover, it ignores the political-corruption factor as well as the potential environmental damage resulting from bureaucratic delay.

  以上就为大家整理的“GMAT写作黄金80题范文赏析22”,更多精彩内容,请关注新东方在线GMAT频道。


本文关键字: GMAT写作范文 GMAT写作 GMAT

添加美研助教号 回复【GMAT】

获取2024GMAT考试最新复习资料

更多资料
更多>>
  • GMAT写作段落如何划分

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT写作段落如何划分,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!  第一段:

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-26 09:23:00 关键字 : GMAT写作

  • GMAT写作之公理介绍

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT写作之公理介绍,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!  1 在我们通

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-26 09:15:00 关键字 : GMAT写作

  • GMAT写作高分关键之风格

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT写作高分关键之风格,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!  GMAT作

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-26 09:06:00 关键字 : GMAT写作

  • GMAT写作之入门备考

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT写作之入门备考,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!  入门写作之

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-25 10:06:00 关键字 : GMAT写作

  • GMAT写作之应试方法

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT写作之应试方法,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!  1 做模版:

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-25 09:15:00 关键字 : GMAT写作

  • GMAT写作要避免的失误

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT写作要避免的失误,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!  1、表达不

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-25 09:06:00 关键字 : GMAT写作

  • GMAT写作如何获得高分

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT写作如何获得高分,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!  1、考生各

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-24 16:17:39 关键字 : GMAT写作

  • GMAT写作开头怎样写好

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来GMAT写作开头怎样写好,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!  写GMAT作

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-24 16:16:46 关键字 : GMAT写作

  • 2021年GMAT写作通用公理

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来2021年GMAT写作通用公理,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频道!  1 在我

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-24 16:15:00 关键字 : GMAT写作

  • 2021年GMAT写作满分要注意的细节

      新东方在线GMAT频道为大家带来2021年2021年GMAT写作满分要注意的细节,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线GMAT频

    来源 : 网络 2021-02-24 16:10:18 关键字 : GMAT写作

更多内容

添加美研助教号

回复【GMAT】获取备考必看资料包

新东方美研备考资料
更多>>
更多惊喜>>
更多>>
更多资料